Status for implementering af Ecodesign og mærkning af villakedler

Transkript

1 Status for implementering af Ecodesign og mærkning af villakedler Jean Schweitzer DGC

2 Part 1: The situation (Resumé) Part 2: Implementation in DK Part 3: Impact in DK: Will the measures Ecodesign and labelling bring sufficient information to the customer?

3 Part 1: The situation (Resumé) Two directives entering into force on 26. september 2015 Directive 2009/125/EC Ecodesign = Minimum requirements on efficiency, NO x etc. Directive 2010/30/EU Labelling = Indication by labelling of energy consumption

4 Minimum requirements Heaters Hot water appliances

5 Label: Appliances and systems The labeling system is divided into two parts: appliance label and system label Combinations possible with solar energy or other appliances The manufacturer is responsible for the first label (appliance), while the dealer is responsible for the second label (system).

6 2013: Measures adopted for the 2 directives Timeline 2014: Implementation work 2015 Sept. 1st Measures in force Minimum requirement: Efficiency of all appliances Labelling of appliances Labelling of system 2017 Sept. New Measures in force New minimum requirement: Efficiency mchp, HP 2018 Sept. New Measures in force Minimum requirement: NO x all (combustion based) appliances. Revision of the measures? (CO, CxHy, etc..?) Label extended from A++ to A+++?

7 APPLIANCE Label A++ A+ A B C D E Heat pumps Cogeneration CH boilers

8 Lack of differentiation! The EU label target is to compare technologies of very different efficiencies: from boilers to heat pumps the coverage from 30 % to 150 % (= 12 % avg. range for one class) makes that all appliances of one type are mostly in one or two categories thus no differentiation within the same technology. CH boilers CH solar mchp Heat pumps D C B A A+ A++

9 Some questions Market surveillance - how will it be organised? Overall bad experience with MS of Ecodesign products Installers role: how will they produce a package labelling? (rather complicated) Market distortions? Gas appliance (third-party test)/other appliances (self-declaration) Hi/Hs end user information (e.g. 102 % Hi to 92 % Hs) Hybrid technologies (gas boiler + EHP). How are they treated in the package label? Appliances cost/appliance label: Boilers are only ca. 30 %/40 % less effective compared to A+++ technologies, but cost 3 times less affordability issue. Lack of differentiation within the same technology DK case - Boiler + tank not treated! etc.

10 Part 2 Implementering i DK Oplæg til aktivitetsplan (TI/DGC) for ENS Målgruppe VVS-installatører, som typisk er Forhandlere (1) af de omfattede produkter. Producenter og importører er Leverandører (1) og ikke direkte målgruppe for de her foreslåede aktiviteter. Aktivitetsområder Der foreslås i oplægget en række aktivitetsområder, som kan formidle de relevante budskaber i ecodesign- og energimærknings-forordningerne: 811/2013, 812/2013, 813/2013 & 814/2013. (1) Ecodesigndirektivet og energimærkningsdirektivet (og de relaterede forordninger) opererer med begreberne Leverandør og Forhandler. Der er forskellige krav til Leverandører og Forhandler.

11 Oplæg til aktivitetsplan Det er valgt at dele budskaberne op i forskellige grupper: 1. Forståelse af energimærkerne og ecodesignkrav 2. Krav til installatøren som forhandler 3. Ecodesignkrav i forhold til anden lovgivning og praksis 4. Energimærkning og andre rådgivningsværktøjer

12 Forslag til aktivitetsområder Informationsmateriale Artikler til fagblade og til lokalaviser Hjemmeside Powerpoint-præsentationer, der kan benyttes af VVS-branchen Vejledninger Forstå og vær i stand til at forklare din kunde betydningen af energimærket og sammenligningen mellem forskellige teknologier Krav til dig (installatøren) i forbindelse med salg og annoncering Opdatering af Videncenter for Energibesparelser i Bygningers produktguides for de berørte produkter Budbringere/ambassadører. Formidling gennem brancheaktører - videreformidling til medlemmerne, der formidler til installatørerne/forhandlerne Videncenter for Energibesparelser, Tekniq, DS-Håndværk & Industri, Blik & rør, Dansk Gas Forening, OR, GSR, VPO Leverandørforeninger, DEBRA, Varmepumpefabrikantforeningen, VELTEK, grossisterne, gasselskabernes Energispareudvalg, Energi- og olieforum, Dansk Energi m.fl. Events/arrangementer

13 Part 3 Impact in DK: Will the measures Ecodesign and labelling bring sufficient information to the customer? What will happen to the existing systems (DK gas boiler label + boiler list)? Her skriver du præsentationens titel i masteren

14 DK mærkning VS ECO The DK design label cannot labelling remain after the EU label enters in force Our main loss will be the lack of differentiation between gas boilers on the DK market and details about efficiency, etc. If we still want to differentiate gas boilers we need to keep a complementary info system that would use the same data as the Ecodesign

15 S U S T A I N A B L E G A S DK-mærkning i dag Samlet mærkning Årligt elforbrug Årsnytte-virkningsgrad NO x Test varmt vand Kedeleffekt min./maks. Keeping the list; removing references to labels?

16 We are (almost) ready to go ahead with a list after 2015! CE report DGC model Premix boilers Heating Efficiency data in DGC format Test data hot water DGC test or CEN test DGC annual efficiency method BOILER PERFORMANCE LIST GASPRO

17 Why have a list and GASPRO? Effect Removes bad appliances from the market Informs the users of the overall efficiency of heating technologies Ranks gas appliances for a standard installation Ranks gas appliances for a given customer Conclusion ECO design Not very useful in DK as trad. boilers are already banned; EU label Interesting information, but no use in case the user cannot choose the heating technology DK list Differentiates gas boilers GASPRO Differentiates gas boilers for a given installation/customer Directives do not cover all needs Her skriver du præsentationens titel i masteren Good Complementarity

18 Conclusion New measures/limited impact for Denmark ENS will help with implementation Still many open questions Market surveillance DK case boiler + hot water tank not in the system Hybrid Etc. Need for keeping a differentiation between gas boilers boiler list + GASPRO Her skriver du præsentationens titel i masteren

19 Annexes Her skriver du præsentationens titel i masteren

20 Minimum seasonal space heating energy efficiency Appliance AFTER 2 YEARS AFTER 4 YEARS Fuel boilers 70 kw Fuel boilers > 70 kw and 400 kw Type B11 boilers Cogeneration space heaters 86 % unchanged Full load 86 % Part load 94 % unchanged 75 % unchanged 86 % 100 % Heat pumps 100 % 110 % Lowtemperature heat pumps 115 % 125 %

21 Appliance AFTER 5 YEARS Max NO x emissions (all given on GCV*) * Gross calorific value Gas boilers Fuel oil boilers Cogeneration space heaters or Heat pumps with external combustion using gaseous fuels Cogeneration space heaters or Heat pumps with external combustion using liquid fuels Cogeneration space heaters or Heat pumps with internal combustion using gaseous fuels Cogeneration space heaters or Heat pumps with internal combustion using liquid fuels 56 mg/kwh 120 mg/kwh 70 mg/kwh 120 mg/kwh 240 mg/kwh 420 mg/kwh

22

23 Produkter til opvarmning S U S T A I N A B L E G A S

24 Space heater INPUT data = Pin & Eff at Pmax % 30% NO x + El. + SBY

25 Heating Pmax Pmax Pmax Pmin 30% Pmin 30% Pmax 40/60 C 60/80 C 40/60 C 30/50 C 60/80 C 30/36 30/50 C 47/53 G20 Return temperature ( C) 60,00 40,00 30,00 60,00 30,00 30,00 47,00 40,00 Flow temperature ( C) 80,00 60,00 50,00 80,00 36,00 50,00 53,00 60,00 Net heat input (kw) 17,3 17,1 17,3 4,0 5,4 4,0 5,3 17,1 Heat output (kw) 16,8 17,2 18,4 3,9 5,8 4,3 5,4 17,2 Net efficiency (%) 96,8 100,6 106,2 97,5 108,9 108,9 102,1 100,6 Efficiency uncertainty (% rel.) 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 Flue gas temperature ( C) (vol-%) 9,3 9,3 9,3 8,6 8,5 8,6 8,6 9,3 2 NOx (mg/kwh) 163,8 150,6 131,6 23,3 38,6 23,3 38,6 150,6 NOx uncertainty (% rel.) Flue gas loss (% of heat input) Condensate flow (l/h) 0,00 1,50 2,14 0,09 0,75 0,53 0,44 1,50 Ambient temperature ( C) 25,1 25,1 25,1 25,1 25,1 25,1 25,0 25,1 Ambient pressure (mbar) 1014,9 1014,9 1014,9 1016,5 1014,4 1016,5 1014,4 1014,9 Humidity (g / kg dry air) 9,1 9,1 8,9 8,9 9,1 8,9 9,1 9,1 CO (mg/kwh) 114,4 95,7 99,6 2,9 4,4 2,9 4,4 95,7 CO uncertainty (% rel.) 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 Reference: number + page (details in list below) Standby loss (NF) T = 50 C (W) Standby loss (NF, blocked) T = 50 C (W) Minimum boiler temperature ( C) 5 Pre-purge time (s) 5 DGC procedure data Post-purge time (s) 30 Pump power during efficiency testing (W) 14 Time constant, heating (s) Time constant, cooling (s) Pilot flame net heat input (W) 0 Pilot flame net efficiency (%) Hot water production (DK test method) Standby before tapping Heat input (kwh) 2,0 Ambient temperature ( C) 20,0 Test duration (h) 48,0 Tapping Heat input (kwh) 14,0 Heat output (kwh) 12,0 Maximum water temperature during first tapping ( C) 65,0 Ambient temperature ( C) 20,0 Test duration (h) 2,0 Standby after tapping Heat input (kwh) 2,0 Ambient temperature ( C) 20,0 Test duration (h) 48,0 For full premix condensing boilers we can assess efficiency from Ecodesign parameters El. & SBY are available (not necessarily in the same format, but acceptable) Performances with a water tank cannot / at this stage / accurately be calculated from boiler efficiency and tank SBY. A test would be best here