Forskningsdata. DEFF-Konferencen Henrik Pedersen 10. maj 2017

Transkript

1 Forskningsdata DEFF-Konferencen 2017 Henrik Pedersen 10. maj 2017

2

3 3

4 Det bliver dyrere og dyrere Følgegruppen i UFM Cost-BenefitAnalyse 4

5 Persondataforordningen 5

6 The Internet of FAIR Data and Services The European Open Science Cloud(EOSC) should be a federated, globally accessible environment where researchers, innovators, companies and citizens can publish, find and re-use each other's data and tools for research, innovation and educational purposes. The EOSC is branded by the HLEG as The Internet of FAIR Data and Services

7 Britiske Tier-2 landskab 2016: EPSRC vedligeholder og fornyr britisk Tier-2 landskab fra 2011 (opslag) 1. Solid Science Case, Business Case og Financial Case 2. Datalagring indlejret i lokale Tier-3 eller i de nationale Tier-2 installationer Og vinderen blev Kun ét af de tidligere seks konsortier bliver videreført De fleste nye konsortier har oftest karakter af anpartsselskaber, der på overbevisende vis har magtet at løsrive HPC ejerskab og leverance fra geografisk location. Lokalt fokus på e-science er oftest bedre tænkt ind i de nye konsortiemodeller Konsortier, hvor forskergrupper går sammen om at foreslå særlig risikabel arkitektur Andre har etableret partnerskaber med sektorforskning eller private virksomheder Fokus på kosteffektiv, serviceorienteret og kompetent HPC Tier-2 installation Cambridgemodellen

8 Finland The Open Science and Research initiative Substantial resources into policy-making, implementation and monitoring To be widely utilised in Finnish society. In 2014, the Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland released The Open Science and Research Roadmap Open Science Handbook and a Data Management Guide directed at Finnish researchers Services for data storage and data publishing Facilities for digital preservation of research materials and more elaborate tools for data management 8

9 Norway Trondheim Interesting Features: Ownership Management E-Science competencies Possible Rotation Tromsø 9

10 Europe -On the way to the EOSC-an Example DFG and Generic Research Data Infrastructure Stop the excessive niche focus! Establish a NRDI network, A single point of access to data The DFG contribution to EOSC 3 pilot projects and then roll it out over Germany to obtain the Generic Research Data Infrastructure

11 Institutions and Persons The National RDM Forum 8 universities Researchers Librarians Support Office Folks Vice-Chancellor s Office System administrators The Royal Library, Aarhus The Royal Library, København The National Archive ( 30 persons) Working since August 2015 On a given strategy Vicechancellor office Infrastructure Folks Librariesand Archives Researchers 11

12 Common Ground-Vision for juni 2018 Danmark har et nationalt sammenhængende sæt af DM-politikker hos universiteterne, som: bakkes op af forskningsråd, ministerier, bevaringsinstitutioner og er åben for andre forskningsinstitutioner sikrer at forskeren får hjælp med at planlægge og effektuere data management for hele datas livscyklus er forankret såvel lokalt som internationalt sikrer modeller for finansiering og fordeling af udgifterne til DM mellem interessenterne Der er et velforstået, velfungerende og let tilgængeligt landskab af infrastrukturer til datas hele livscyklus, som: skelner mellem og skaber sammenhæng mellem lokalt, nationalt og internationalt niveau. Lever op til aftalte kriterier, herunder navnlig åbne adgangskriterier og transparente forretningsmodeller har support-funktion tager afsæt i lokale udviklings- og driftsmiljøer håndterer såvel fortrolige som åbne data Der er etableret samarbejde på tværs af interessenter om: kompetenceudvikling ekspertnetværk incitaments- og meriteringsstrukturer 12

13 August 2015 kick-off RDM Forum Meetings Common Ground Brainstorm on possible DM Forum activities October 2015 Agreement on procedure and of reimbursement Formation of a DM Forum collaborative activity portfolio RDM infrastructure pilot project call wording, objectives and criteria January 2016 RDM infrastructure pilot project Q&A session + pitches March 2016 June 2016 Review of RDM infrastructure pilot project proposals, recommendations for DM CAB Revised DM Forum type 2 activities portfolio - Planning of TtT; - Go to Collaborative activities October DM Policy of CPH University (Health Sciences) - Establish Law Expert Group - Feed back from DM Technology Expert Group February EOSC, FAIR DATA, GO FAIR 13

14 DM Forum TtT Activities August 2015 kick-off Future Search RDM experiences & challenges talks by Elixir, 3TU.Datacentrum and OPEN January 2016 Data Management Planning - talk by Kevin Ashley, Digital Curation Centre, UK March 2016 The making of a domain specific RDM policy talk by Nicole Schmitt, KU Health Legal aspects of RDM talks by Experts from CPH University April 2016 Essentials 4 Data Support - a course series adapted for a Danish context October 2016 RDM as a wicked problem course by Andrew Cox, Sheffield RDM for Grant Office People November 2016 EOSC workshop with Barend Mons, Chair HLEG February 2017 High-level implementation of Research Data Management policies April 2017 Research Data and Meta Data for Experts April-May 2017 Legal aspects of Open Data, 3 workshops 14

15 Infrastructure Pilot Video Life Cycle DM Adds DM capabilities to the existing edumedia video platform. ScienceCloud4Cities Develops a national infrastructure for collecting, sharing and processing of both historical and near real time smart city energy data National Science App Store Construct a cloud with data processing, analysis, publishing and archiving capabilities in the form of apps ActionableBiomarkerDK- Actionable Biomarkers in Human Disease Addresses the problem of turning a genome into a small set of actionable biomarkers useful for diagnostics and drug development 15

16 DM Forum Collaborative Activities (1:2) RDM Policy implementation (phase I) AU + SB + KU + AAU + DTU + Royal Library RDM -Needs and Infrastructure (phase I) AAU + DTU + KU Digital DM guide (phase I) All Institutions E-Lab-Book AU + KU + DTU Ph.D. courses in RDM SDU + AAU + KU + National Archive (+ maybe also OPEN) International collaboration DTU + SDU (KE, EUDAT-CDI, RDA, NeIC, Prace? Template for Institutional RDM Policy (completed) SDU + AAU + AU + RUC Reports from the Local Anchoring of RDM 16

17 17 Manglende datamanagement 1. Ingen ekstern finansiering 2. Ingen publikationer Lad os komme i gang: 1. Vi skal have en datamanagement politik 2. Den skal implementeres på institutterne 3. Både en politik og en implementeringsplan kræver en grundig medvirken af alle forskere på SDU

18 18 Forslag fra SDU DM Forum Direktionen RI-rådet RIO laver en plan for høring, inklusion og feed back SDU DM Forum Vi har et udkast tilpolitik klar - inkl. en plan for Implementering Råd, nævn og enheder på SDU inkl. DM Advisory Group

19 19 Responsibilities SDU acknowledges the importance of ensuring that all research data are managed so that they are secure, accessible, and, where appropriate, reusable, and so that any ethical, confidentiality and privacy requirements and concerns are respected. The responsibility is shared between

20 20 Principal investigators (PI): Supervise Research Data Management:PIs must ensure that researchers under their management are instructed to conduct research in accordance with the policy and are made aware of their responsibilities as mentioned in this policy Researchers: Research Data Management:Researchers must ensure that research data are managed in line with best practice in their field; this includes planning the management of their primary materials and data.

21 21 Storing research data: Researchers must ensure that primary materials and data are retained, stored and managed in a clear and accurate form that allows results to be assessed, the procedures to be retraced and, when relevant and applicable, the research to be reproduced. What to store and for how long:researchers are, unless otherwise regulated, responsible for deciding the extent to and duration for which primary materials and data are to be retained. When deciding this, researchers should consider the value of the primary materials for assessing the results of the research and the physical and technical possibility of storage at the institution.

22 22 Disposal:Researchers should plan for the appropriate disposal of primary materials and data. Access and sharing:researchers are responsible for managing the access to their research data and are encouraged to make their research data freely accessible, except when this is in conflict with contractual legal obligations or current regulations on for example ethical, confidentiality or privacy matters or intellectual property rights.

23 23 SDU: Data storage:sdu must provide a storage system that allows researchers to manage their data responsibly. Such a storage system includes: storage space, access control, and back-up. Research Data Catalogue: SDU must provide a research data catalogue that enables data to be findable, accessible and citable. Research Data Management Support:SDU should 1) provide education and training opportunities; 2) provide advice on practice, legal issues and infrastructures; and 3) develop and maintain common systems and infrastructures for research data management.

24 24 COST - Dette Kræver Ressourcer Eksempler: DTU 3 FTE, Göttingen5 FTE, Træningskurser: Til forskere, støttepersonale og ledelsesansvarlige Metadatering: Faglige traditioner, international forankring, maskinlæsbarhed, standarder Jura: Persondataforordning, ejerskab af data, IPR og data, fortrolighed og etik SDU-GO: Opmærksomme på krav fra fonde til (FAIR) data Infrastruktur: Lagring og deling af aktive data, til arkivering af resultatdata, til beregninger og andre værktøjer

25 DMP online

26 DMP online DKOSC

27 27

28 HPC 1 HPC 2 DKOSC DMP online

29 HPC 1 HPC 2 Cloud sync DKOSC Zenodo DMP online Catalogue National Archive

30 - - Tak for opmærksomheden! Klyngecomputer Storage