Stress blandt danske kvinder bliver tiltagende. Bilag 1 Karrieremødre stresser livet i laser, 14. februar 2010

Transkript

1 Bilag 1 Karrieremødre stresser livet i laser, 14. februar 2010 Foto: Lea Meilandt Mathiesen Af Redaktionen Stress blandt danske kvinder bliver tiltagende Side 1 af 1

2 Bilag 2 Aktier: Europa i højeste niveau i halvandet år, 6. april 2010 Investor :56 Indekset steg med 0,6 pct. til 269,07. Piraeus Bank lukkede 5,1 pct. lavere, National Bank of Greece faldt med 4,8 pct., og EFG Eurobank gik i Nyhedsbureauet Direkt Side 1 af 1

3 Bilag 3 Mortensen, Sille Wulff PFA: Aktiernes nedtur kommer snart, 23. april 2010 Investor 1 PFA: Aktiernes nedtur kommer snart :06 af Sille Wulff Mortensen Relateret indhold Borsen.dk 23/04 Foto: Colourbox overraskelse. Faktisk har vi set korrektioner under de tre 23/04 Amerikansk boligsalg sender USA-aktier op 23/04 Analytikere venter svagt regnskab fra Vestas 23/04 Bankers optur skyldes rekordlav USA-rente 23/04 Apple overhaler gnavne Microsoft i S&P /04 22/04 Kursgraf Kurs: OMXC20 +2,42% 411,50 Sidste 7 dage Selskabet venter desuden, at virksomhederne vil skrue op for investeringerne, og sammen med et stigende 07:29 Forfatter: v.p. PFA Besvar Side 1 af 1

4 Bilag 4 Hansen, Uffe Danskerne sætter kursen ud af krisen, 22. april 2010 Foto: Colourbox :26 af Uffe Hansen Relateret indhold Borsen.dk 22/04 Forbrugertillid stryger til vejrs 22/04 Industrien klar med investeringskroner der stadig er udfordringer. Her er vurderingerne fra storbankernes eksperter: stabiliseret sig." stor rolle i mange forbrugeres vurdering, at huspriserne nu er stigende i stedet for faldende." Jakob Jakobsen, chefanalytiker, Nykredit Markets: er, at privatforbruget vokser med 2,7 pct. boligmarked har sparet op i stedet for at forbruge."

5 Annoncer fra Google Rente Obligationer Se kurs og rente for obligationer samt renteudviklingen her! Falder renten falder din ydelse. FIH Erhvervsbank tilbyder en konto

6 Bilag 5 6DQGKHGHQ RP ÀDG VNDW MXOL Sandheden om flad skat dag i Jyllands-Posten 2. Jamen, vil en flad skat ikke give state skatning. Det er slut med de komplekse. Dette betyder, de 3. Rammer den flade skat ikke lavindkomstgrupperne? se, hvor borgerne begynder at at personer med lave indkomster slet ikke er omfattet. Der skal kun betales skat S 4. Overhovedet - mens den nye flade skat bliver implementeret Storbritannien. En flad skat vil give lignende resultater. i USA og under Margaret Thatcher i Nej. Det er mere samlede skatteregning. Det er ikke andelen af deres indkomst, ne, ville de fleste betegne det som et Det er lige omvendt. Eftersom et fladt skattesystem fjerner de fleste af de skattefritagelser og fradrag, der findes i det graduerede (progressive) system, om borgerne kun at vide, hvor meget man har tjent. De fleste af de oplysninger, de har nemmer r udbetalt fra tilsvarende procentsatser. Det er ikke socialistiske stater - har ikke den lange historie med veletablerede i - herunder de tidligere

7 . Nogle ser fordele i i der giver en maksimal investorer, bl.a. klare ejendoms- og erhvervsretlige bestemmelser, bliver de endnu mere attraktive for udenlandske investorer. ande som skatteprocenter? De lande men derimod en " konkurrence om fordele, da det lobale - tryghed og begejstring. CEPOS ( Landgreven 3, 3. sal DK-1301 Fax: info@cepos.dk (mailto:info@cepos.dk)!

8 Bilag 6 White, Adrian Leicester produces the first-ever world map of happiness, 27. juli 2006 NEWS - PRESS RELEASES Leicester Produces the first ever World Map of Happiness Happiness is...being Healthy, Wealthy and Wise News and Events of Psychology, analysed data published by UNESCO, the CIA, the New Economics Foundation, the WHO, the Veenhoven Database, the Latinbarometer, the Afrobarometer, and the UNHDR, to create a global projection of subjective well-being: the first world map of happiness. The projection, which is to be published in a Psychtalk in March 2007, will be presented at a conference later in the year. Participants in the various studies were asked questions related to happiness and satisfaction with life. The meta-analysis is based on the findings of over 100 different studies around the world, which questioned 80,000 people worldwide. For this study data has also been analysed in relation to health, wealth and access to education. The data used to construct the map were extracted from a meta-analysis published by the New Economics Foundation (Marks, N. et al. (2006). The Happy Planet Index. London: New Economics Foundation). Picture Credit: Adrian White, Psychology Whilst collecting data on subjective well-being is not an exact science, the measures used are very reliable in predicting health and welfare outcomes. It can be argued that whilst these measures are not perfect they are the best we have so far, and these are the measures that politicians are talking of using to measure the relative performance of each country. The researchers have argued that regular testing as a collaboration between academics in different countries would enable us to track changes in happiness, and what events may cause that. For example what effect would a war, or famine, or national success have on a country's members' happiness.. Adrian White said: and psychology, most closely associated with new developments in positive psychology. It has also become a feature in the current political discourse in the UK. "There is increasing political interest in using measures of happiness as a national indicator in conjunction with measures of wealth. A recent BBC survey found that 81% of the population think the Government should focus on making us happier rather than wealthier. nations. "Further analysis showed that a nation's level of happiness was most closely associated with health levels (correlation of.62), followed by wealth (.52), and then provision of education (.51). "The three predictor variables of health, wealth and education were also very closely associated with each other, illustrating the interdependence of these factors. However, when people are asked if they are happy with their lives, people in countries with good healthcare, a higher GDP per captia, and access to education were much more likely to report being happy. 125th. These are countries that are thought as having a strong sense of collective identity which other researchers have associated with well-being. "It is also notable that many of the largest countries in terms of population do quite badly. With China 82nd, India 125th and Russia 167th it is interesting to note that larger populations are not associated with happy countries."

9 compared to the health, financial and educational needs in other parts of the World. The current concern with happiness levels in the UK may well be a case of the 'worried well'." "I have used data on happiness published by the New Economics Foundation (Marks, N., Abdallah, S., Simms, A, Thompson, S.(2006). The Happy Planet Index. London: New Economics Foundation). I have also sourced data from UNESCO on access to schooling, from the WHO on life expectancy, and from the CIA on GDP per capita. I have then performed new analysis with this data to come to a unique and novel set of results; specifically the extent of correlation between measures of poverty, health and education, and the variable of happiness. I have also presented the data on happiness in the form of a global projection, the 'World Map of Happiness'." The 20 happiest nations in the World are: 1 - Denmark 2 - Switzerland 3 - Austria 4 - Iceland 5 - The Bahamas 6 - Finland 7 - Sweden 8 - Bhutan 9 - Brunei 10 - Canada 11 - Ireland 12 - Luxembourg 13 - Costa Rica 14 - Malta 15 - The Netherlands 16 - Antigua and Barbuda 17 - Malaysia 18 - New Zealand 19 - Norway 20 - The Seychelles Other notable results include: 23 - USA 35 - Germany 41 - UK 62 - France 82 - China 90 - Japan India Russia The three least happy countries were: Democratic Republic of the Congo Zimbabwe Burundi Note to Newsdesk:

10 Adrian White, Analytic Social Psychologist at the Leicester produces first ever global projection of international differences in subjective well-being; the first ever World Map of Happiness. UK 41st out of 178 countries for happiness. Happiness is found to be most closely associated with health, followed by wealth and then education. Managed by Press Office [Copyright] and [Disclaimer]

11 Bilag 7 QS World Rankings, April 2010 Times Higher Education-QS World Rankings 2009 TOP 200 WORLD UNIVERSITIES 1 1 Harvard US Cambridge UK Yale US College London UK = 6 Imperial College London UK = 4 Oxford UK Chicago US Princeton US Massachusetts Institute of Technology US California Institute of Technology US Columbia US Pennsylvania US = Johns Hopkins US = Duke US Cornell US Stanford US Australian National Australia McGill Canada Michigan US = 23 Edinburgh UK = 24 ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) Switzerland Tokyo Japan UK Hong Kong Hong Kong Kyoto Japan Manchester UK Carnegie Mellon US France Toronto Canada = National Singapore Singapore

12 31 27 Brown US = 30= California, Los Angeles US = 33 Northwestern US Bristol UK Hong Kong Science and Technology Hong Kong = 34= Ecole Polytechnique France = 38 Melbourne Australia = 37 Sydney Australia California, Berkeley US = British Columbia Canada Queensland Australia = Switzerland = 44 Osaka Japan = 49 Trinity College Dublin Ireland Monash Australia Chinese Hong Kong Hong Kong = 45 New South Wales Australia = 50= Seoul National South Korea = 53 Amsterdam Netherlands = 56 Tsinghua China Copenhagen Denmark = 40 New York US = 50= Peking China Boston US = 78= Technical Munich Germany = 61 Tokyo Institute of Technology Japan Heidelberg Germany Warwick UK Alberta Canada Leiden Netherlands = 65 Auckland New Zealand = 55 Wisconsin-Madison US = 81= Aarhus Denmark = 71 Illinois at Urbana-Champaign US Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Belgium Birmingham UK = 66 London School of Economics UK = 88 Lund Sweden Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology South Korea = 67 Utrecht Netherlands = 81= York UK Geneva Switzerland

13 Contact Bilag 8 Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2009 Academic Ranking of World Universities Methodology Statistics Analysis Top World Rank Institution* Region Regional Rank Country National Rank Score on Alumni Score on Award Score on HiCi Score on N&S Score on PUB Score on PCP Total Score Harvard Americas Stanford Americas California, Americas Berkeley Cambridge Europe Massachusetts Institute of Technology Americas (MIT) California Institute of Technology Columbia Princeton Chicago Oxford Yale Cornell California, Los Angeles California, San Diego Americas Americas Americas Americas Europe Americas Americas Americas Americas Americas Pennsylvania Americas

14 Washington Americas Wisconsin - Americas Madison California, Americas San Francisco The Johns Hopkins Americas The Tokyo College Europe London Michigan - Americas Ann Arbor Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Europe Zurich Kyoto Illinois at Urbana- Americas Champaign The Imperial College of Science, Europe Technology and Medicine Toronto Americas Minnesota, Americas Twin Cities Washington in Americas St. Louis Northwestern Americas Duke Americas New York Americas Rockefeller Americas

15 Colorado at Boulder Americas California, Americas Santa Barbara British Americas Columbia Maryland, Americas College Park The Texas at Americas Austin North Carolina at Americas Chapel Hill Pierre and Marie Curie - Paris 6 The Manchester Vanderbilt Copenhagen Paris Sud (Paris 11) Pennsylvania State - Park California, Irvine Southern California The Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Europe Europe Americas Europe Europe Americas Americas Americas Americas

16 Dallas California, Davis Karolinska Institute Pittsburgh Utrecht The Edinburgh Zurich Rutgers, The State New Jersey - New Brunswick Munich Technical Munich Florida Carnegie Mellon The Australian National Bristol The Ohio State - Columbus Heidelberg The Hebrew Jerusalem King's College London McGill Americas Europe Americas Europe Europe Europe Americas Europe Europe Americas Americas Europe Americas Europe Europe Americas

17 Americas Purdue - West Americas Lafayette Oslo Europe Brown Americas Ecole Normale Superieure - Europe Paris Osaka Leiden Europe Helsinki Europe Boston Americas Melbourne Uppsala Europe Moscow State Europe Arizona Americas Rochester Americas Utah Americas The Europe Nagoya Nottingham Europe Tohoku Basel Europe Michigan State Americas Case Western Reserve Americas

18 88 Stockholm Europe Texas A&M - College Americas Station 90 Goettingen Europe McMaster Americas Virginia Americas Indiana Americas Bloomington 94 Arizona State - Americas Tempe 94 Birmingham Europe Sydney Aarhus Europe Bonn Europe Rice Americas Emory Americas * Institutions within the same rank range are listed alphabetically. Top Contact Us SiteMap Privacy Statement Copyright 2009 ShanghaiRanking Consultancy. All Rights Reserved.

19 Bilag 9 Øget skattekonkurrence i jagten på økonomisk vækst, 8. november 2006 Men flere faktorer end blot skattesatsen gennemskueligt skattesystem og et attraktivt erhvervsklima, giver skattelettelser kun kortsigtet effekt. lave selskabsskatter Danmark som vindere i den internationale skattekonkurrence. placere deres aktiviteter, og medlemslande reducerede skatten fra 2005 til fastholde arbejdspladser, og koncernskat. investeringer. Landets skattetakst er hvilket er den laveste skattesats blandt de gamle EU-lande. seneste som bl.a. Polen og Ungarn. mellem beskatning og skattesystem skattelettelser og reorganiserede skattesystemet i slutningen af 80'erne og starten af 90'erne. Det har Danmark 28%. Tilsvarende har Sverige og Norge i begyndelsen af 1990'erne reduceret selskabsskattesatsen Kontaktperson Telefon: soerensoenderholm@kpmg.dk Hjem Om KPMG Presserum Pressemeddelelser Side 1 af 2

20 KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved KPMG Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab a Danish limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Side 2 af 2

21 Bilag 10 Corruption Perceptions Index, 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) table shows a country's ranking and score, the number of surveys used to determine the score, and the confidence range of the scoring. The rank shows how one country compares to others included in the index. The CPI score indicates the perceived level of public-sector corruption in a country/territory. The CPI is based on 13 independent surveys. However, not all surveys include all countries. The surveys used column indicates how many surveys were relied upon to determine the score for that country. The confidence range indicates the reliability of the CPI scores and tells us that allowing for a margin of error, we can be 90% confident that the true score for this country lies within this range. Rank Country/Territory CPI 2009 Score Surveys Used Confidence Range 1 New Zealand Denmark Singapore Sweden Switzerland Finland Netherlands Australia Canada Iceland Norway Hong Kong Luxembourg Germany Ireland Austria Japan United Kingdom United States Barbados Belgium Qatar

22 Bilag 11 OECD names and shames tax havens, 3. april 2009 OECD names and shames tax havens The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has published its blacklist of non-cooperative tax havens. Costa Rica, Malaysia, and the Philippines are the countries listed as not having agreed to tax standards. Uruguay had originally been listed too, but later protested that it had been wrongly included. After listening to its arguments the OECD said it was happy the country had agreed to its tax transparency rules. The list is part of efforts agreed at the G20 summit to clamp down on havens. There is also a list of 38 places that have agreed to improve standards but not yet done so, such as Gibraltar, Liechtenstein, Andorra and San Marino. 'Willing to co-operate' On Thursday, G20 leaders agreed to take sanctions against tax havens using the OECD list as its basis. In their communique, they agreed, "to take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens". "We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over." Uruguay had objected to its inclusion on the list, published earlier on Friday. The South American country sent a letter to Angel Gurria, secretary-general of the OECD, from its He informed the OECD that Uruguay had formally endorsed the body's standards on transparency and exchange of information. "I am pleased that Uruguay joins a growing number of nations willing to co-operate in fighting tax evasion and other tax abuses," said Mr Gurria. Pressure Angel Gurria, secretary general of the OECD, said that the G20 summit had helped to focus minds on the issue of tax havens. There were frosty negotiations between France and China over the inclusion of Macau Paul Mason, BBC Two Newsnight economics editor "We've had more progress in the last two weeks on this matter than we've had in the last 10 or 12 years," he told the BBC. He added that the progress had come despite the leaders not specifying what sanctions they would take.

23 "[Non-cooperating countries] will move because they know the question of sanctions, however illdefined that was, is going to affect them somehow." The Philippines is already reported to be taking steps to remove itself from the blacklist. "The Philippine government would take the necessary steps to ensure we meet their expectations," Trade Secretary Peter Favila told the Associated Press news agency. "It is really up to us to prove them wrong." Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said that his country should not be on the blacklist at all. "We should not be in that category as, in practice, we have been committed to OECD requirements," he said in a statement. Story from BBC NEWS: Published: 2009/04/03 22:04:55 GMT BBC MMX