E-LASS Kick-off work shop Borås, 8-9 October 2013 The light road toward sustainable shipping The ECO-Island Ferry Project Niels Hjørnet Yacht Design Yacht Design & Composite Engineering Mats Hjortberg, M.Sc.Nav.Arch Coriolis AB - Göteborg Carbon Fibre Specialists Jens Otto Sørensen
1. Purpose 2. How 3. Lessons learned 4. Project organisation 5. Next?
How do we convince them? By demonstrating that by reducing the weight of smaller vessel hull structure, significantly reduction in fuel consumption and environmental impact can be achieved (by comparing an existing steel ferry with an alternative design of a ferry in carbon fibre sandwich composite with the same payload and speed)simple power vs. resistance calculation. By documenting that by calculating the accumulated cost of the vessel in its entire service life, there will be an economical benefit from selecting the more expensive composite material (by performing a complete life cycle cost analysis (LCCA, Woodward model) for the two ferries) By documenting that by calculating the accumulated environmental impact of the vessel in its entire service life including disposal/decommissioning of the vessels, there will be a similar reduction compared to the traditional steel vessel (by performing a complete life cycle analysis (LCA) in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 for the two ferries) To perform a required and relatively new approval procedure for vessels built from other materials than steel, and obtain a formal approval from the maritime authorities (by performing a full-scale fire risk analysis in accordance with SOLAS Ch. II-2 Reg. 17 and IMO MSC. 1002)
Same earning!! Tunø Island ferry (steel) Carbon fibre alternative Speed: 9.5 knots Passengers: 200 Cars: 6 Deck cargo: 3.075t Displacement: Main engines: Fuel consumption: 340 t 2x294 kw 100l/h Displacement: Main engines Fuel consumption: 120 t 2x110 kw 53.1l/h
LCC - Accumulated cost Ref.: Lindqvist, Å (2012) Life Cycle Cost Analysis SP Report Brd6035-01 BREAK EVEN POINT
Respiratory inorganics Global warming Photochemical ozone, vegetat. Eutrophication, terrestrial Human toxicity, non-carc. Ecotoxicity, terrestrial Human toxicity, carcinogens Acidification Respiratory organics Ecotoxicity, aquatic Nature occupation Eutrophication, aquatic Ozone layer depletion Mineral extraction Ionizing radiation Non-renewable energy EUR2003 LCA Environmental impact ISO 14040/14044 Ref.: Watson, J. Jannick H. Aalborg 2012 90,000 80,000 70,000 Eco Island Ferry Tun Island Ferry 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0
Eco Island Ferry Tun Island Ferry Eco Island Ferry Tun Island Ferry Eco Island Ferry Tun Island Ferry LCA Contribution to impact ISO 14040/14044 Ref.: Watson, J. Jannick H. Aalborg 2012 100% Respiratory inorganics Global warming Photochemical smog Disposal 80% Operation 60% 40% Maintenance Construction 20% 0%
Projektorganisation for ØKO-Ø Færge projektet Diskussionspartnere: Søfartsstyrelsen Danmark Transportstyrelsen Sverige Økonomisk partnere: Västra Götalandsregionen Den Danske Maritime Fond AAU-F Kockums Frh Erhvervsråd (MARKIS) Styregruppe: Odder Kommune K DAY-U Følger projektet: DTU Plastic industriendk Chalmers Västtraffik Styrsjöbolaget Småøernes Færgeselskaber Miljøstyrelsen Det økologiske råd PF Trading Hauschildt Marine NORISOL A/S- K Niels Hjørnet Yacht Design Coriolis AB Danish Yachts A/S NHY-U LCA CONSULTANTS -U SP FIRE-U U = Projektudførende K = Konsulent F = Fundraiser DIAB-K HG-Electric DK
Fire Safety: EC Ferry directive (Only steel or aluminium) High Speed Code ( slow speed ) SOLAS (Reg. 17 Fire risk analysis) National one off regulations
Next?
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent; -it is the one that is most adaptable to change Charles Darwin 1809-1882 WWW.ECO-ISLAND.DK WWW.ECO-ISLAND.SE