1. How many of the lectures for this module have you participated in? 2. How much of the curriculum have you read?

Relaterede dokumenter
About the course: (Please comment to your right) - To which degree has the course facilitated learning the skills outlined in the academic aims?

1.3 How do you rate the coordination of this course to other (related) courses?

INTEL INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING AND LEARNING AARHUS UNIVERSITET

LESSON NOTES Extensive Reading in Danish for Intermediate Learners #8 How to Interview

Engelsk. Niveau D. De Merkantile Erhvervsuddannelser September Casebaseret eksamen. og

Engelsk. Niveau C. De Merkantile Erhvervsuddannelser September Casebaseret eksamen. og

Observation Processes:

Generelt om faget: (Eventuelle kommentarer til højre) - Givet målbeskrivelsen ovenfor, hvordan vurderer du så pensum?

Evaluering af Master in Leadership and Innovation in Complex Systems

Basic statistics for experimental medical researchers

Generelt om faget: - Hvordan vurderer du dit samlede udbytte af dette fag?

1 s01 - Jeg har generelt været tilfreds med praktikopholdet

The X Factor. Målgruppe. Læringsmål. Introduktion til læreren klasse & ungdomsuddannelser Engelskundervisningen

Barnets navn: Børnehave: Kommune: Barnets modersmål (kan være mere end et)

Resultatet af undervisningsevalueringer på økonomiuddannelsen på Det samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet, universitetsåret

Danish Language Course for International University Students Copenhagen, 12 July 1 August Application form

DK - Quick Text Translation. HEYYER Net Promoter System Magento extension

Financial Literacy among 5-7 years old children

Brug af logbog i undervisning. Karen Lauterbach Center for Afrikastudier Adjunktpædagogikum 19. Juni 2013

Resultater af spørgeskemaundersøgelse: Econometrics 2 - Lectures - Hans Christian Kongsted/Heino Bohn Nielsen (skemanr = 55, evalid=1642)

(Eventuelle kommentarer til højre) - Givet målbeskrivelsen ovenfor, hvordan vurderer du så pensum?

Danish Language Course for Foreign University Students Copenhagen, 13 July 2 August 2016 Advanced, medium and beginner s level.

2. Spørgsmål med flere svarmuligheder Procent. Very good 5,6% Good 94,4% Average 0% Poor 0% Very poor 0% 3. Åbent spørgsmål

Evaluering af Master in Leadership and Innovation in Complex Systems

Vina Nguyen HSSP July 13, 2008

Vores mange brugere på musskema.dk er rigtig gode til at komme med kvalificerede ønsker og behov.

Resultatet af undervisningsevalueringer på økonomiuddannelsen på Det samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet, universitetsåret

US AARH. Generelle oplysninger. Studie på Aarhus Universitet: MA Cognitive Semiotics. Navn på universitet i udlandet: Tartu University.

Navn: DM515, F12, Introduktion til lineær og heltalsprogrammering

Agenda. The need to embrace our complex health care system and learning to do so. Christian von Plessen Contributors to healthcare services in Denmark

Sport for the elderly

TØ PÅ MATEMATIK AARHUS UNIVERSITET SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LEARNING LAB 18. AUGUST 2017 CENTERLEDER, ST LEARNING LAB

Engelsk 5. klasse årsplan 2018/2019

PARALLELIZATION OF ATTILA SIMULATOR WITH OPENMP MIGUEL ÁNGEL MARTÍNEZ DEL AMOR MINIPROJECT OF TDT24 NTNU

(Eventuelle kommentarer til højre) - Givet målbeskrivelsen ovenfor, hvordan vurderer du så pensum?

Engelsk 6. klasse årsplan 2018/2019

1 What is the connection between Lee Harvey Oswald and Russia? Write down three facts from his file.

Internationalt uddannelsestilbud


We hope you have enjoyed your holiday and that you are willing to help us improve our holiday support programme by completing this questionnaire.

Titel: Barry s Bespoke Bakery

To the reader: Information regarding this document

Roskilde Universitet Jeanette Lindholm PHD-.student

Udbud på engelsk i UCL. Skabelon til beskrivelse

GUIDE TIL BREVSKRIVNING

Trolling Master Bornholm 2015

Reventlow Lille Skole

Project Step 7. Behavioral modeling of a dual ported register set. 1/8/ L11 Project Step 5 Copyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU 1

Semesterevaluering efteråret 2013 SIV Spansk

Tema: Pets Fag: Engelsk Målgruppe: 4. klasse Titel: Me and my pet Vejledning Lærer

Bilag. Resume. Side 1 af 12

Remember the Ship, Additional Work

Result of Evaluation Table A (Course evaluation) The prerequisites listed in the course description were:

Resultatet af undervisningsevalueringer på økonomiuddannelsen på Det samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet, foråret 2009.

Trolling Master Bornholm 2012

Engelsk 8. klasse årsplan 2018/2019

How many of the scheduled lessons (exercise lessons excluded) have you attended?

Tilmelding sker via stads selvbetjening indenfor annonceret tilmeldingsperiode, som du kan se på Studieadministrationens hjemmeside

Nanna Flindt Kreiner lektor i retorik og engelsk Rysensteen Gymnasium. Indsigt i egen læring og formativ feedback

Linear Programming ١ C H A P T E R 2

Eksempel på eksamensspørgsmål til caseeksamen

USERTEC USER PRACTICES, TECHNOLOGIES AND RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Reventlow Lille Skole

POSitivitiES Positive Psychology in European Schools HOW TO START

1 4 12,5% ,6% ,2% 4 2 6,2% 5 3 9,4% I alt ,0%

Temaopgave - Den keltiske tiger

Managing stakeholders on major projects. - Learnings from Odense Letbane. Benthe Vestergård Communication director Odense Letbane P/S

Den nye Eurocode EC Geotenikerdagen Morten S. Rasmussen

How Long Is an Hour? Family Note HOME LINK 8 2

how to save excel as pdf

Better driving experience guaranteed!

Dean's Challenge 16.november 2016

Design til digitale kommunikationsplatforme-f2013

Den uddannede har viden om: Den uddannede kan:

Hvad skal vi leve af i fremtiden?

Listen Mr Oxford Don, Additional Work

Measuring the Impact of Bicycle Marketing Messages. Thomas Krag Mobility Advice Trafikdage i Aalborg,

Hardu udenlandsk uddannelse?

Fag: Engelsk Niveau E Casearbejdsdag

Travel General. General - Essentials. General - Conversation. Asking for help. Asking if a person speaks English

Travel General. General - Essentials. General - Conversation. Asking for help. Asking if a person speaks English

The EAL Jobportal. How to get started

Boligsøgning / Search for accommodation!

Titel: Hungry - Fedtbjerget

Tilmelding sker via stads selvbetjening indenfor annonceret tilmeldingsperiode, som du kan se på Studieadministrationens hjemmeside

The River Underground, Additional Work

Nyhedsmail, december 2013 (scroll down for English version)

Brug sømbrættet til at lave sjove figurer. Lav fx: Få de andre til at gætte, hvad du har lavet. Use the nail board to make funny shapes.

Web præsentation F 07: 2263: Economics of the Family. Udskriv, Præsentationslink etc. Dato for publicering: :57:46

Praktikevaluering Studerende (Internship evaluation Student)

Application form - au pair (please use block capial letters when filling in the form)

Tilmelding sker via stads selvbetjening indenfor annonceret tilmeldingsperiode, som du kan se på Studieadministrationens hjemmeside

Mobilitet, navigering og udnyttelse - unge ukrainske migranter i den globale grønne industri gennem den danske stats fodermesterordning

Generelt om faget: (Eventuelle kommentarer til højre) - Givet målbeskrivelsen ovenfor, hvordan vurderer du så pensum?

GIVE IT. SOME ENGlISH1. Hedwig

Evaluering af kurset: IT Foundations (BGBI)

Danskhjælpen er en lille opslagsgrammatik. Her kan du læse om de grammatiske emner, før eller imens du arbejder med dine Grammar-opgaver.

Applications. Computational Linguistics: Jordan Boyd-Graber University of Maryland RL FOR MACHINE TRANSLATION. Slides adapted from Phillip Koehn

Semesterevaluering efteråret 2013 Historie

Richter 2013 Presentation Mentor: Professor Evans Philosophy Department Taylor Henderson May 31, 2013

Transkript:

1. How many of the lectures for this module have you participated in? None or almost none (0-20%) 0 0.0% Few (21-40%) 0 0.0% Some (41-60%) 1 5.9% Many (61-80%) 1 5.9% All or almost all (81-100%) 15 88.2% Total 17 100.0% 2. How much of the curriculum have you read? None or almost none (0-20%) 0 0.0% A little bit (21-40%) 1 5.9% Some (41-60%) 8 47.1% A lot (61-80%) 7 41.2% All or almost all (81-100%) 1 5.9% Total 17 100.0% 3. What personal circumstances have affected your work effort? One week of personal travel. new educational environment and system, cultural shock and education standard difference in particular Assiduous,teamwork, communication I starten af semestret påvirkede studieforholdene i høj grad indsatsen, ligesom den enorme arbejdsbyrde og til tider begrænsede kommunikation har påvirket min indsats. Dertil har familiemæssige issues kostet kræfter, men det til trods vurderer jeg stadig byrden på studiet til at være stor og kommunikationen (forventningsafstemning) for sparsom Min tvivl om min fremtidige karriere. The time of adapation to the 1st module. New way of working and learning I come from Asia and have different culture background, which requires me to study hard to adapt to the new environment The teamwork skills. I feel Danish student did not give equal opportunities for others

De emner som virkelig har interesseret mig, har jeg læst op på til fuld personlig tilfredsstillelse. Det har dog hurtigt slået mig, hvilke forelæsninger og forelæsere som man sagtens kunne have undgået, hvilket jeg også finder positivt i forhold til plan- og tilrettelæggelse af pensum. 4. In relation to my own qualifications I experienced the curriculum as: Too difficult 0 0.0% Difficult 4 26.7% Just right 10 66.7% Easy 1 6.7% Too easy 0 0.0% Total 15 100.0% 5. Do you have any other comments on the curriculum? Brugbart og interessant pensum, men igen er det grundet sparsom kommunikation vanskeligt at vurdere hvor meget der skal kunnes og i hvilket omfang - her menes i forhold til eksamen. Dog var mængden for stor - to lærebøger og et kompendium. I hope we can have more proper curriculun schedule. I hope the curriculum schedule can be improved It's hard to finish writing all before each lectures It was very good and comfortable for students, included me. 6. How would you rate the teachers ability to communicate the knowledge.. -.. from an academic point of view (e.g. preparation, knowledge of the subject, use of aids etc.) Very good 3 20.0% Good 9 60.0% Somewhat 3 20.0% Poor 0 0.0% Very poor 0 0.0% Total 15 100.0%

6. How would you rate the teachers ability to communicate the knowledge.. -.. from an educational point of view (e.g. the ability to inspire, vary and explain the subject, present it in a facinating way etc.) Very good 0 0.0% Good 7 46.7% Somewhat 5 33.3% Poor 3 20.0% Very poor 0 0.0% Total 15 100.0% 7. What can the teacher do to improve the quality of the lessons? Cater to the preferences of most students SM Good and inspiring lectures - however I would really wish that the slides were handed out before-hand! This makes it easier to follow and questions the content (if not understood) OS: Good and inspiring lectures. RT: Sadly this is the reason for the "low" score. At times it is really difficult to understand Romeo - both articulatory and thought wise. Hard to say how it can be improved, however I think Romeo should prepare new slides and rethink them and especially the comments he adds to the slides. By giving more case studies and correct them in class. By narrowing the topic more interaction and communications with students Make lectures more interesting I have no comments. Det er lidt svært at beskrive med ord, for jeg tror personligt, at det handler om hvilken type person man er som undervisning. Om stoffet er spændende/tørt eller relevant/irrelevant afspejles også tit af, om man synes kvaliteten af undervisningen er optimal. Svært område at objektivisere, da det primært er en subjektiv præstation som skal vurderes. 8. How would you rate your overall gain from the module? Very high 0 0.0% High 5 35.7%

Resonable 8 57.1% Low 0 0.0% Very low 1 7.1% 9. Do you have any additional comments in relation to this module? If yes, what? Skrækkelig start grundet uhensigtsmæssig gruppeinddeling. Alt for store differencer i niveau og interesser samt arbejdsindsats. Dertil er det nok en idé at kalde de danske elever til samling og forklare at de (vi) skal fungere som en tovholdere og vejledere for de udenlandske studerende. Dette er væsentligt, da der i forvejen er meget at se til og alle måske ikke er klar til opgaven - især ikke uforberedte! Dertil meget store svingninger i vejlednings kvalitet: S og O tog sig gerne rigtig lang tid til at gennemgå det skrevne, hvorimod R ikke involverede sig i brugbar stil (ingen hetz!) Emnet er rimelig bredt, men det er også det, som har gjort dette modul spændende. Rigtig god indgangsvinkel til studiet efter min opfattelse. Dette er også sagt på baggrund af de efterfølgende projekter, hvor vi har kunnet bruge teori og modeller fra netop dette modul. 1. How many of the lectures for f this module have you participated in? None or almost none (0-20%) 0 0.0% Few (21-40%) 0 0.0% Some (41-60%) 2 14.3% Many (61-80%) 2 14.3% All or almost all (81-100%) 10 71.4% 2. How much of the curriculum have you read? Respondents Percent None or almost none (0-20%) 0 0.0%

A little bit (21-40%) 1 7.1% Some (41-60%) 8 57.1% A lot (61-80%) 3 21.4% All or almost all (81-100%) 2 14.3% 3. What personal circumstances have affected your work effort? 10 days of personal travel. teamwork,communication,presentation The fact that the data have been transmitted very late...so less time to analyza the data and find conclusion and the right strategy. lack of the knowledge of the reaserch method Teamwork spirit Min arbejdsindsats har under dette modul været optimal, da jeg kom i en ny gruppe, som havde større ambitioner end foregående. Desuden var min præstation til eksamen under første modul ren elendighed, hvilket nok har været den største personlige motivationsfaktor til at arbejde i højeste gear, hvilket der også blev gjort. 4. In relation to my own qualifications I experienced the curriculum as: Too difficult 0 0.0% Difficult 4 28.6% Just right 8 57.1% Easy 2 14.3% Too easy 0 0.0% 5. Do you have any other comments on the curriculum? Svært pensum - hvor det kunne være fint med mere vejledning I, hvad der er væsentligst deri.

the schedule is not so proper that some curriculum come too late for the process of writing project Rigtig god underviser i R. Han holdt et højt niveau hele vejen igennem, og formåede altid at få de studerende til at engagere sig i materialet og undervisningen. 6. How would you rate the teachers ability to communicate the knowledge.. -.. from an academic point of view (e.g. preparation, knowledge of the subject, use of aids etc.) Very good 5 35.7% Good 6 42.9% Somewhat 2 14.3% Poor 0 0.0% Very poor 1 7.1% 6. How would you rate the teachers ability to communicate the knowledge.. -.. from an educational point of view (e.g. the ability to inspire, vary and explain the subject, present it in a facinating way etc.) Very good 4 28.6% Good 7 50.0% Somewhat 3 21.4% Poor 0 0.0% Very poor 0 0.0% 7. What can the teacher do to improve the quality of the lessons? RT: Same critique as to the first module. Undervisningen i at behandle kvantitativ data var simpelthen for ringe! Ustruktureret og uinspirerende. Det skal der sættes flere ressourcer af til!

By giving more examples and concrete cases more interaction and communication with students Make it easy to understand I do not know. ingen kommentar til R, og de andre skulle efter min mening blive bedre til at vejlede og få de studerende til at engagere sig. 8. How would you rate your overall gain from the module? Very high 0 0.0% High 5 35.7% Resonable 7 50.0% Low 2 14.3% Very low 0 0.0% 9. Do you have any additional comments in relation to this module? If yes, what? Unpleasant experience at the exam - maybe because lack of communication about expectations! Language Danish 10 38.5% English 16 61.5% Total 26 100.0% Distribution Form

E-mail 0 - Paper 0 - Merge 0 - Total 0 - E-mail Created 2011-01-13 15:17:46 2011-01-13 15:17:48 2011-01-13 15:21:53 2011-01-13 15:25:14 2011-01-13 16:12:48 2011-01-13 16:28:10 2011-01-13 18:05:38 2011-01-13 19:38:36 2011-01-13 20:35:42 2011-01-13 20:41:11 2011-01-13 21:04:52 2011-01-13 21:42:35 2011-01-14 09:31:20 2011-01-14 10:05:46 2011-01-14 12:41:39 2011-01-14 13:17:09 2011-01-14 20:34:07 2011-01-16 15:39:12 2011-01-17 09:57:29 2011-01-19 09:20:16 2011-01-19 09:34:06 2011-01-20 14:13:22 2011-01-20 22:42:05 2011-01-21 10:06:25 2011-01-26 13:09:17 2011-01-28 15:33:31

Overall Status New 0 0.0% Distributed 0 0.0% Partially Complete 12 46.2% Complete 14 53.8% Rejected 0 0.0% Total 26 100.0%