FresnoState NSSE Engagement Engagement Engagement,AcademicPerformance,andMajor: StatisticalandVisualAnalysis DmitriRogulkin AssociateDirector,O ficeofinstitutionalefectiveness FresnoState CAIR2016
FresnoState NSSE Engagement Engagement http:/www.fresnostate.edu/academics/oie/data/index.html
FresnoState NSSE Engagement Engagement NSSESpring2015
FresnoState NSSE Engagement Engagement Studentengagementrepresentstwocriticalfeaturesofcolegiatequality. Thefirstistheamountoftimeandefortstudentsputintotheirstudies andothereducationalypurposefulactivities.thesecondishow the institutiondeploysitsresourcesandorganizesthecurriculum andother learningopportunitiestogetstudentstoparticipateinactivitiesthat decadesofresearchstudiesshow arelinkedtostudentlearning.(nsse) http:/nsse.indiana.edu/html/about.cfm
FresnoState NSSE Engagement Engagement Descriptives EngagementIndicator ColaborativeLearning Colege Colaboratingwithpeersinsolvingproblemsormasteringdificultmaterialdeepens understandingandpreparesstudentstodealwiththemessy,unscriptedproblems theyencounterduringandaftercolege.workingongroupprojects,askingothersfor helpwithdificultmaterialorexplainingittoothers,andworkingthroughcourse materialinpreparationforexamsalrepresentcolaborativelearningactivities. Items(Distribution) Askedanotherstudenttohelpyou understandcoursematerial Explainedcoursematerialtooneormore students Preparedforexamsbydiscussingor workingthroughcoursematerialwithothe. Workedwithotherstudentsoncourse projectsorassignments Never Sometimes Often Veryoften 132 41 224 87 696 601 485 500 589 621 602 270 337 459 308 413 EI:Student-FacultyInteraction(Distribution) Freshman(1st year) 151 125 88 64 27 36 15 22 60 15 230 261 261 124 76 83 Nul 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NSSE Engagement Engagement Descriptives Pearson Correlation 0 20 40 60Dif.inAvg.ValuebetweenSeniors andfreshmen DiscussionswithDiverse Others Higher-OrderLearning QualityofInteractions LearningStrategies EfectiveTeaching Practices Reflectiveand IntegrativeLearning SupportiveEnvironment ColaborativeLearning QuantitativeReasoning Student-Faculty Interaction 37 44 40 38 40 38 38 35 36 33 30 35 27 30 19 23 7.0 1.4 2.5 0.9-0.5 3.5-3.1 4.9 3.2 4.2 Colege NSSEItem Description Comparison Total
Engagement Engagement Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAby Major Question1: IstherearelationshipbetweentheNSSE EngagementandStudentGPA? Question2: IstherevariationintheEngagement-GPA relationshipsamongcoleges? Whatengagementindicatorsaremoreimportantfor thespecificmajors?
Engagement Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor
Freshmenvs Seniors Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor HighValue Responses: Diference
Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor HighValueResponses: Diference End 0 20 40 60 Dif.inAvg.Value 0 500 1,000 N DiscussionswithDiverse Others Higher-OrderLearning QualityofInteractions LearningStrategies EfectiveTeaching Practices Reflectiveand IntegrativeLearning SupportiveEnvironment ColaborativeLearning QuantitativeReasoning Student-Faculty Interaction 40 43 40 40 38 38 37 38 34 34 33 34 29 29 20 22 3.1 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.7 584 775 836 622 557 735 584 765 644 864 648 877 704 536 665 885 634 857 640 857 Level Comparison GPA3+vs2.9- NSSEEngagementIndicator Colege TotalorbyColege Total HSGPA 2.04to4.44 andnulvalues
Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor HighValueResponses: Diference End Abouthow manyofyourcoursesatthis institutionhaveincludedacommunity-based project(service-learning)? Most Some None Academicadvisors:Beenavailablewhenneeded Verymuch Quiteabit Some Verylittle Academicadvisors:Discussedyourcareer interestsandpost-graduationplans Verymuch Quiteabit Some Verylittle Academicadvisors:Helpedyougetinformationon specialopportunities(studyabroad,internships, researchprojects,etc.) Verymuch Quiteabit Some Verylittle Academicadvisors:Helpedyouunderstand academicrulesandpolicies Verymuch Quiteabit Some Verylittle Academicadvisors:Helpedyouwhenyouhad academicdificulties Verymuch Quiteabit Some Verylittle Academicadvisors:Informedyouofacademic Verymuch 245(64%) 43(11%) 87(23%) 8(2%) 107(33%) 87(27%) 77(24%) 53(16%) 81(27%) 55(18%) 74(25%) 92(30%) 85(30%) 74(26%) 48(17%) 76(27%) 85(28%) 83(27%) 67(22%) 74(24%) 85(29%) 72(25%) 70(24%) 64(22%) 75(25%) 367(69%) 114(21%) 10(2%) 44(8%) 121(28%) 132(30%) 126(29%) 57(13%) 109(26%) 103(25%) 115(28%) 85(21%) 117(30%) 87(23%) 90(23%) 91(24%) 116(28%) 102(25%) 95(23%) 96(23%) 82(22%) 98(27%) 97(26%) 90(25%) 67(17%) Items(Distribution):StudentswithGPAversus2.99orless Level Colege
Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor HighValueResponses: Diference End PercentofHighValueRepsonses(ex.VeryOften,Often,Excelent,etc). (Select/clickonitem descriptiontoseedetaileddistribution) Explainedcoursematerialtooneormorestudents 59% 70% 11.3% irclass Haddiscussionswithpeoplewithreligiousbeliefsotherthanyour own 69% 79% 10.2% Colege Qualityofinteractionswithfaculty Evaluatedwhatothershaveconcludedfrom numericalinformation 40% 67% 49% 76% 8.9% 8.5% GPAGroup Instructors:Usedexamplesorilustrationstoexplaindificult points Used:Colaborativeeditingsoftware(Wikis,GoogleDocs,etc.) 70% 78% 49% 56% 8.4% 7.0% Items(Distribution) Courseworkemphasized:Memorizingcoursematerial 67% 74% 6.8% Useoftechnologycontributedto:Learning,studying,orcompleting courseworkwithotherstudents 72% 78% 6.7% Numberofhigh-impactpracticesforseniorsmarked'Doneorin progress'(learncom,research,intern,abroad,andcapstone)or'. 54% 61% 6.6% Haddiscussionswithpeoplewithpoliticalviewsotherthanyour own 67% 73% 6.5% Academicadvisors:Discussedyourcareerinterestsand post-graduationplans 45% 51% 6.4% Triedtobetterunderstandsomeoneelsesviewsbyimagininghow PercentofHighValue Responses Diferencebetween "3.0plus"and"2.9mi.
Descriptives PearsonCorrelation EIandGPAbyMajor HighValueResponses: Diference End Thankyouforattending.?